Rooting for the enemy

Volokh Conspiracy:

"Leading 'peace movement' group admits that it supports the enemy: International ANSWER, which co-organized last Saturday's Washington protest, now openly admits that it wants 'the Iraqi anti-colonial resistance' -- which, as Michael Totten points out, apparently consists of 'three primary groups[:] Saddam’s Baathist remnants, local theocratic Islamists, and foreign foot soldiers for Al Qaeda' -- to win:

"'The anti-war movement here and around the world must give its unconditional support to the Iraqi anti-colonial resistance.'

"Yup, that's right. They fully admit it: They want people to give unconditional support to our nation's enemies, and a particularly evil set of enemies at that. (What do you think will blossom in Iraq if 'the Iraqi anti-colonial resistance' will win? Democracy? Religious freedom? Women's equality? Gay rights? Free speech? 'Civil rights & civil liberties,' which the International ANSWER Web site urges people to defend?)

"Really, as others (notably Glenn Reynolds) have said, they're not anti-war, they're just for the other side."

What is the definition of treason?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains