Where is the evidence to support net neutrality proponents fears of deregulation?

Washington Post:
More than 20 states sue FCC over its net neutrality decision

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who is leading the suit, said that the FCC’s repeal of net neutrality was “arbitrary and capricious” and violates federal law.
In the weeks since the FCC voted to do away with net neutrality, I can't tell a bit a difference and doubt anyone else can either. 

What I have noticed since the election is the data gathers at Google and Facebook have been anything but neutral in dealing with conservative content.  They have been censoring it and using bogus fact checkers that seem to be done only to conservative sites.  How about some net neutrality in dealing with content?

The market can deal with the speed issue.  Competitors are already bragging about their speed so it is hard to see why they would think it is in their interest to slow some content down.  Dealing with liberal censorship is a much bigger problem for free speech.  If this is not fixed they can expect some litigation I suspect.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains